Статьи о загранице, путешествиях и отдыхе

Мальдивы цены, стоимость отдых на мальдивах стоимость из Санкт-Петербурга

7 Сентябрь 2010

Photogenic

написано в рубрике: Software — Метки: — admin @ 12:13
Page 1 of 512345
Cases when the facsimile of the person allows to receive only rather remote representation about it are frequent. That the person can be learned in a photo, — is far not a warranty of the true similarity. Photos on documents not bad show it. To learn the person on them it is possible. But the impression of the image happens very far from how the real person is perceived actually.
This interesting property of a photo can be found out not only at shooting of people. Very often beginning photographers look at the photolandscapes and can’t learn them. Where that magic sensation by nature which was explicitly felt at the moment of shooting? Where that bewitching play of light and shades? Where the mood has disappeared?
Why so happens? After all if the photo displays a reality, apparently, recognition practically always should be easy and absolute!
Fig. 1. Angelina Jolie
(A photo from a site http:// www.dailycollage.com)
About people who almost always well quit on pictures, say that they are photogenic (fig. 1) see. Expressing more a simple language, it is possible to tell that «the camera loves them». Thus фотогеничность isn’t so mandatory coincides with the true attractiveness and beauty. Happens, as the beautiful person in life can quit not too well in pictures. And happens, as from некрасавицы the fine model turns out.
The reason of all this mismatch consists that a photo — ideal means for reality display is far not. The most important reasons of it consist in the following:
1. A photo — the playback of a fragment of a reality plane, scaled and restricted on the area.
2. Real brightness and contrasts rarely coincide with brightness and contrasts on the facsimile. On this mismatch singularities of handling of the visual data in a head of the person are superimposed. A human brain — the system which is carrying out difficult non-linear correction of perceived brightness and contrasts. On the basis of such correction perception also is formed. An example of difficult handling of the visual data in a brain of the person is Edward Adelsona’s illusion (E.H. Adelson), published by it in 1995 (fig. 2 see). Besides the subjective factor, the share of distortions to perception import and objectively existing reasons, such, for example, as «an optical system picture» (see article [1]).
3. The information item makes essential impact on perception. In real life the object is in a surrounding of other objects. There are smells. There is a prehistory. The crucial role is played by a context., Etc. the Facsimile is the information block which has been pulled out from the specific information environment.
Fig. 2. Illusion of Adelsona. Want trust, want isn’t present — but small squares And and In brightness and saturations is identical on color, (their are identical of what it is easy to be convinced by means of any graphics editor) © E.H. Adelson, 1995
Differently, the photo is realistic, but not on 100 %. Sensation from a photo never can coincide with impressions of object of shooting completely. Tourists and travelers face this simple true more often others. It as to another, it is known to anybody that one business — a photo in the guidebook, the advertizing leaflet or log, and quite another matter — a reality.
From all aforesaid follows that one objects, owing to the properties, more others приспособленны for display by imperfect photographic technologies. Also it is necessary to name them “photogenic”.
To a certain extent фотогеничность it is similar to charisma: it or is, or it isn’t present. Unfortunately, this simple true understand not all. It is often possible to meet judgement that фотогеничность is a set of talent of the photographer, suitable lighting and correctly picked up clothes, a make-up, etc. No doubt, all mentioned factors play very large role in the course of obtaining of the qualitative facsimile. But whether they do object of shooting photogenic? According to the author of this article, no. To a certain extent, skill of the photographer also consists in being able to photograph not photogenic objects.
Thus, from the aforesaid at all doesn’t follow what remove photogenic objects the fool can also. Certainly, it not so! The Photographer-neumeha is capable «запороть» any, even the most outstanding, фотогеничность. But for the master фотогеничность — already half of success.
The Internet is full councils whether how to become photogenic, etc. There is in them a sense? Unconditionally is. With one small correction: they have no relation to фотогеничности. Their purpose in other: to help not photogenic people to look better. Approximately the same purpose and at cosmetics: it doesn’t do the person beautiful as a matter of fact, but appreciably to affect perception of the person by other people it in a state. The beautiful person is beautiful and without cosmetics, and a considerable quantity of preliminary manipulations well to turn out in a photo isn’t required to the photogenic person. The most important council for model: to trust in professionalism of the make-up artist and the photographer. Their knowledge and experience more than often plays a main role at shooting.
What practical outputs the photographer from resulted above reasons can make? According to the author, they are that.
First of all, it is necessary not to forget that photographic technologies have restricted possibilities. Even the latest scientific achievements don’t do technics ideal.
Secondly, it is useful to remember complexity of process of perception of the visual information the person. Thereupon, it is useful not to neglect preliminary photosamples. The analysis of such photosamples often allows to introduce reasonable corrective amendments in shooting process.
Thirdly, it is necessary to remember that beauty and фотогеничность don’t coincide. Ability to foresee a mismatch level between these two factors comes with experience. Hence, it is necessary to practise and analyze the received results more.
Fourthly, it is reasonable to approach to shooting of each object as not photogenic. Moreover, it is reasonable to learn to remove first of all not photogenic objects. Having seized this skill, with shooting of photogenic objects the photographer somehow will consult.
Well, and last: it is desirable to familiarize with operating time of colleagues, to esteem the literature, to experiment … Only a private experience will allow to achieve qualitative results by means of imperfect tools.

Cases when the facsimile of the person allows to receive only rather remote representation about it are frequent. That the person can be learned in a photo, — is far not a warranty of the true similarity. Photos on documents not bad show it. To learn the person on them it is possible. But the impression of the image happens very far from how the real person is perceived actually.
This interesting property of a photo can be found out not only at shooting of people. Very often beginning photographers look at the photolandscapes and can’t learn them. Where that magic sensation by nature which was explicitly felt at the moment of shooting? Where that bewitching play of light and shades? Where the mood has disappeared?
Why so happens? After all if the photo displays a reality, apparently, recognition practically always should be easy and absolute!
Fig. 1. Angelina Jolie(A photo from a site http:// www.dailycollage.com)    About people who almost always well quit on pictures, say that they are photogenic (fig. 1) see. Expressing more a simple language, it is possible to tell that «the camera loves them». Thus фотогеничность isn’t so mandatory coincides with the true attractiveness and beauty. Happens, as the beautiful person in life can quit not too well in pictures. And happens, as from некрасавицы the fine model turns out.
The reason of all this mismatch consists that a photo — ideal means for reality display is far not. The most important reasons of it consist in the following:
1. A photo — the playback of a fragment of a reality plane, scaled and restricted on the area.2. Real brightness and contrasts rarely coincide with brightness and contrasts on the facsimile. On this mismatch singularities of handling of the visual data in a head of the person are superimposed. A human brain — the system which is carrying out difficult non-linear correction of perceived brightness and contrasts. On the basis of such correction perception also is formed. An example of difficult handling of the visual data in a brain of the person is Edward Adelsona’s illusion (E.H. Adelson), published by it in 1995 (fig. 2 see). Besides the subjective factor, the share of distortions to perception import and objectively existing reasons, such, for example, as «an optical system picture» (see article [1]). 3. The information item makes essential impact on perception. In real life the object is in a surrounding of other objects. There are smells. There is a prehistory. The crucial role is played by a context., Etc. the Facsimile is the information block which has been pulled out from the specific information environment.

Fig. 2. Illusion of Adelsona. Want trust, want isn’t present — but small squares And and In brightness and saturations is identical on color, (their are identical of what it is easy to be convinced by means of any graphics editor) © E.H. Adelson, 1995   Differently, the photo is realistic, but not on 100 %. Sensation from a photo never can coincide with impressions of object of shooting completely. Tourists and travelers face this simple true more often others. It as to another, it is known to anybody that one business — a photo in the guidebook, the advertizing leaflet or log, and quite another matter — a reality.
From all aforesaid follows that one objects, owing to the properties, more others приспособленны for display by imperfect photographic technologies. Also it is necessary to name them “photogenic”.
To a certain extent фотогеничность it is similar to charisma: it or is, or it isn’t present. Unfortunately, this simple true understand not all. It is often possible to meet judgement that фотогеничность is a set of talent of the photographer, suitable lighting and correctly picked up clothes, a make-up, etc. No doubt, all mentioned factors play very large role in the course of obtaining of the qualitative facsimile. But whether they do object of shooting photogenic? According to the author of this article, no. To a certain extent, skill of the photographer also consists in being able to photograph not photogenic objects.
Thus, from the aforesaid at all doesn’t follow what remove photogenic objects the fool can also. Certainly, it not so! The Photographer-neumeha is capable «запороть» any, even the most outstanding, фотогеничность. But for the master фотогеничность — already half of success.
The Internet is full councils whether how to become photogenic, etc. There is in them a sense? Unconditionally is. With one small correction: they have no relation to фотогеничности. Their purpose in other: to help not photogenic people to look better. Approximately the same purpose and at cosmetics: it doesn’t do the person beautiful as a matter of fact, but appreciably to affect perception of the person by other people it in a state. The beautiful person is beautiful and without cosmetics, and a considerable quantity of preliminary manipulations well to turn out in a photo isn’t required to the photogenic person. The most important council for model: to trust in professionalism of the make-up artist and the photographer. Their knowledge and experience more than often plays a main role at shooting.
What practical outputs the photographer from resulted above reasons can make? According to the author, they are that.
First of all, it is necessary not to forget that photographic technologies have restricted possibilities. Even the latest scientific achievements don’t do technics ideal.
Secondly, it is useful to remember complexity of process of perception of the visual information the person. Thereupon, it is useful not to neglect preliminary photosamples. The analysis of such photosamples often allows to introduce reasonable corrective amendments in shooting process.
Thirdly, it is necessary to remember that beauty and фотогеничность don’t coincide. Ability to foresee a mismatch level between these two factors comes with experience. Hence, it is necessary to practise and analyze the received results more.
Fourthly, it is reasonable to approach to shooting of each object as not photogenic. Moreover, it is reasonable to learn to remove first of all not photogenic objects. Having seized this skill, with shooting of photogenic objects the photographer somehow will consult.
Well, and last: it is desirable to familiarize with operating time of colleagues, to esteem the literature, to experiment … Only a private experience will allow to achieve qualitative results by means of imperfect tools.

Detail as a significant element of a composition

написано в рубрике: Software, Tips — Метки: , — admin @ 12:10
Page 1 of 512345
I. Introduction
There are questions which can be closed once and for all. Or, at least, for long enough time. Also there are the questions concerning a category of “eternal”. In the fine arts as, however, and in other art forms, the question on a composition concerns the last category. This word in transfer from Latin means «the composition, compilation» from what it is possible to draw not absolutely correct output that the science about a composition learns people to compose and-or make works of art. It not so. The knowledge of laws of a composition can’t teach to create the person. But it can help it with its own creative search. In what image? The answer is simple: similar knowledge help to avoid typical errors, reduce time of creative search, offer starting points for own experiments, etc.
Trying to reveal a secret successful, from the visual point of view, decisions, psychologists, critics, analysts speak about great variety of elements of a composition: about color, about the form, about ratios, about a relative positioning, about lines, about the invoice, about balance, about circuits and about much-many other.
In this small article it will be a question of details and about their role in creation of indicative visual compositions. Thus the author, certainly, won’t make bold to state that to it the True is known. The task at this article is simple: to give to the beginning author one more tool of the analysis, to pay its attention to ambiguity of existing rules and, finally, to help it with formation of own creative approach.
II. The Detail as an art element
According to «the Literary encyclopedic dictionary» the art detail is «indicative particulars in product, a carrier the considerable semantic and conceptually-emotional loading. … depending on specific implementation … the detail can be specifying, explaining and baring an intention …, but it can be and semantic focus, the condenser of authoring idea, a product leitmotif. … concepts« the art detail “and” particulars »are quite often used and as synonyms — for a designation of the smallest, irresolvable structural element of product …» About the same it would be possible to tell and about a detail visual.
So, the detail can appear in the most various roles. We will illustrate most typical of them.
The Fig. 1 shows, as the small front sight on the person is capable to influence perception of an image essentially. Great force of a front sight has been repeatedly recognized both in the past, and in the present. Whether therefore it is necessary to be surprised, what Jean Maklin (Jan McLean) some dolls lets out with a birthmark on the person?!
Fig. 1. A front sight on the person.
On the right – a doll from © Jan McLean,
At the left – the same doll, but a front sight is remote in the graphics editor.
In this case a front sight as the visual detail, fulfills function of art accentuation. Sometimes say that the accent in the image should be made on the main thing. But it is true only partly. Hardly someone will risk quite seriously to state that the main thing on a girl’s face – a certain point over an upper lip. The art accent happens самоценен. Differently, he can pay our attention not to something the main thing, and simply in itself considerably to change perception of all image as a whole.
But, of course, the accent can play and an additional information role. In this quality the accented detail changes our perception not at the expense of visually-psychological effect, and at the expense of the additional information which it contains in herself. And the second consists in it, not less important, significance of an art detail.
But it is the fullest information essence of details it is uncovered in other images, namely: in the images intended for attentive examining.
The general composite symmetry still continues to play essential enough role for such images. But on the foreground nevertheless there is the information put in numerous details.
As fine example of the similar image the illustration resulted on fig. 2 can serve. The inscription “Ohm” a Devanagari font on a rug, an earring in an ear at a cat, a predatory plant on a window sill, a sexual brush with a bicycle seat, a mandrake root, etc. – each of these elements carries independent information loading. And all of them in aggregate create a unique image of dwelling of the fantastic sorcerer. As a matter of fact the main influence of this image on the spectator is based on set of visual hints.
Fig. 2. The woman receives a magic barley kernel from the sorcerer.
Illustration to a fairy tale-. Andersen “Thumbelina”, © EKINO
In the considered examples information and perceptional (that is caused by perception singularities) roles of an art detail are shown in the brightest, refined type. In the majority of cases, between it two functions it is difficult to lead a clear boundary.
Fig. 3. An illustration to a fairy tale-. Andersen «the Snow queen», © A.I.Arhipov
So, 3 illustration resulted on fig. is a fine example of how separate details can be built perfectly in the general depthbalanced composite creation. Images such can be considered long, receiving esthetic pleasure from separate details. But, at the same time, it are perfectly perceived and as a unit, as a harmonic composition.
Whether can fulfill details still any essential function, besides those two, what have been mentioned above? It is thought, yes. All, finally, depends on the approach. Within the limits of this article it is reasonable to mention also those cases in which details don’t play almost any significant role. The similar state of affairs is characteristic for the products focusing attention of the spectator not on details, and on stains, circuits, structures, etc. Such operations are worse nothing than images with the worked details. Simply authoring accent is made in them on other composite elements.
Fig. 4. Photooperation © Dmitry Konstantinova
As quite good example of such operation serves, according to the author, a photo shown on fig. 4.
III. Specificity of a detail as photocomposition element
Whether there are singularities of the image of details in photographic art? What images dominate in significant photos: detailed or generalized? It is obvious that happens differently. Here the main thing – to depart from a stereotype and not to search for ready recipes. Categorical statements and rectilinear recommendations are rather far from an essence of the matter more often.
The same thought is valid and concerning technical issues. For example, one of the popular beliefs, facsimiles concerning to detailing, consists in the statement that an amount of details in direct ratio the frame areas. Alas, it not so. Certainly, details in среднеформатном a frame will be more than in thin window, but at all in direct ratio to a ratio of the areas. And the main role is played here by leveling role ГРИП [2].
One more technical issue concerning деталировки, directly is connected to number of registering elements (pixels) on a matrix of the numeral camera. Again pertinently to repeat: yes, the number of pixels important, but a main role belongs to other factor. Resulted above an illustration (fig. 1-4) consist of more than modest number of pixels. But whether it is possible to say, what they are deprived деталировки? Certainly, no. Yes, a water color shown on fig. 3, it is better to consider in the original, but also on the screen of the computer it looks завораживающе. And the film is better to look at a cinema, instead of on the screen of the TV set possessing more than modest resolution. But unless restricted possibilities of a TV screen can to prevent to empathize us to characters and to take pleasure in camerawork? Besides, no. Obviously, matter is not in details as those and not among them, and their art significance. And to be significant, the detail should be nevertheless not too small. Number of pixels essentially exactly so how much it helps to embody conceived by the author.
And here one more the example, concerning already esthetic properties of the facsimile. L. P.Dyko in «Conversations about photoskill» writes:
«Equally sharp image of all details which have come into the view of a lens becomes very frequent a serious lack of a picture. The frame starts to dazzle with set of the smallest particulars. The picture picture becomes tangled, overloaded. The eye of the spectator on what certain can’t stop because on a picture plane there is no figure or a subject, drawing to itself special attention, that is isn’t present an accent, the accent delivered on the main thing, on a central part of a plot. There is no main composite beginning – and the frame appears not generated, all its parts – equivalent. As a rule, absence of accent says and that the photographer not only hasn’t coped with the task of creation of certain geometry of a frame, but also has badly understood a material, in a being and sense of the plot selected for shooting, motive».
Partly thought true. But, at the same time, we already saw that images without «the main composite beginning» too can have esthetic value (fig. 2 see). Alas, very often, to make the simple formalized recommendation approaching for all occasions, it is impossible. Councils, recommendations, rules are important. No doubt. But in art they aren’t dogma. Concerns them as to the certain initial reference points facilitating somewhat achievement of delivered result more reasonably.

I. Introduction
There are questions which can be closed once and for all. Or, at least, for long enough time. Also there are the questions concerning a category of “eternal”. In the fine arts as, however, and in other art forms, the question on a composition concerns the last category. This word in transfer from Latin means «the composition, compilation» from what it is possible to draw not absolutely correct output that the science about a composition learns people to compose and-or make works of art. It not so. The knowledge of laws of a composition can’t teach to create the person. But it can help it with its own creative search. In what image? The answer is simple: similar knowledge help to avoid typical errors, reduce time of creative search, offer starting points for own experiments, etc.
Trying to reveal a secret successful, from the visual point of view, decisions, psychologists, critics, analysts speak about great variety of elements of a composition: about color, about the form, about ratios, about a relative positioning, about lines, about the invoice, about balance, about circuits and about much-many other.
In this small article it will be a question of details and about their role in creation of indicative visual compositions. Thus the author, certainly, won’t make bold to state that to it the True is known. The task at this article is simple: to give to the beginning author one more tool of the analysis, to pay its attention to ambiguity of existing rules and, finally, to help it with formation of own creative approach.
II. The Detail as an art element


According to «the Literary encyclopedic dictionary» the art detail is «indicative particulars in product, a carrier the considerable semantic and conceptually-emotional loading. … depending on specific implementation … the detail can be specifying, explaining and baring an intention …, but it can be and semantic focus, the condenser of authoring idea, a product leitmotif. … concepts« the art detail “and” particulars »are quite often used and as synonyms — for a designation of the smallest, irresolvable structural element of product …» About the same it would be possible to tell and about a detail visual.
So, the detail can appear in the most various roles. We will illustrate most typical of them.
The Fig. 1 shows, as the small front sight on the person is capable to influence perception of an image essentially. Great force of a front sight has been repeatedly recognized both in the past, and in the present. Whether therefore it is necessary to be surprised, what Jean Maklin (Jan McLean) some dolls lets out with a birthmark on the person?!

Fig. 1. A front sight on the person.On the right – a doll from © Jan McLean,At the left – the same doll, but a front sight is remote in the graphics editor.   In this case a front sight as the visual detail, fulfills function of art accentuation. Sometimes say that the accent in the image should be made on the main thing. But it is true only partly. Hardly someone will risk quite seriously to state that the main thing on a girl’s face – a certain point over an upper lip. The art accent happens самоценен. Differently, he can pay our attention not to something the main thing, and simply in itself considerably to change perception of all image as a whole.
But, of course, the accent can play and an additional information role. In this quality the accented detail changes our perception not at the expense of visually-psychological effect, and at the expense of the additional information which it contains in herself. And the second consists in it, not less important, significance of an art detail.
But it is the fullest information essence of details it is uncovered in other images, namely: in the images intended for attentive examining.
The general composite symmetry still continues to play essential enough role for such images. But on the foreground nevertheless there is the information put in numerous details.
As fine example of the similar image the illustration resulted on fig. 2 can serve. The inscription “Ohm” a Devanagari font on a rug, an earring in an ear at a cat, a predatory plant on a window sill, a sexual brush with a bicycle seat, a mandrake root, etc. – each of these elements carries independent information loading. And all of them in aggregate create a unique image of dwelling of the fantastic sorcerer. As a matter of fact the main influence of this image on the spectator is based on set of visual hints.

Fig. 2. The woman receives a magic barley kernel from the sorcerer.Illustration to a fairy tale-. Andersen “Thumbelina”, © EKINO   In the considered examples information and perceptional (that is caused by perception singularities) roles of an art detail are shown in the brightest, refined type. In the majority of cases, between it two functions it is difficult to lead a clear boundary.

Fig. 3. An illustration to a fairy tale-. Andersen «the Snow queen», © A.I.Arhipov   So, 3 illustration resulted on fig. is a fine example of how separate details can be built perfectly in the general depthbalanced composite creation. Images such can be considered long, receiving esthetic pleasure from separate details. But, at the same time, it are perfectly perceived and as a unit, as a harmonic composition.
Whether can fulfill details still any essential function, besides those two, what have been mentioned above? It is thought, yes. All, finally, depends on the approach. Within the limits of this article it is reasonable to mention also those cases in which details don’t play almost any significant role. The similar state of affairs is characteristic for the products focusing attention of the spectator not on details, and on stains, circuits, structures, etc. Such operations are worse nothing than images with the worked details. Simply authoring accent is made in them on other composite elements.

Fig. 4. Photooperation © Dmitry Konstantinova   As quite good example of such operation serves, according to the author, a photo shown on fig. 4.
III. Specificity of a detail as photocomposition element
Whether there are singularities of the image of details in photographic art? What images dominate in significant photos: detailed or generalized? It is obvious that happens differently. Here the main thing – to depart from a stereotype and not to search for ready recipes. Categorical statements and rectilinear recommendations are rather far from an essence of the matter more often.
The same thought is valid and concerning technical issues. For example, one of the popular beliefs, facsimiles concerning to detailing, consists in the statement that an amount of details in direct ratio the frame areas. Alas, it not so. Certainly, details in среднеформатном a frame will be more than in thin window, but at all in direct ratio to a ratio of the areas. And the main role is played here by leveling role ГРИП [2].
One more technical issue concerning деталировки, directly is connected to number of registering elements (pixels) on a matrix of the numeral camera. Again pertinently to repeat: yes, the number of pixels important, but a main role belongs to other factor. Resulted above an illustration (fig. 1-4) consist of more than modest number of pixels. But whether it is possible to say, what they are deprived деталировки? Certainly, no. Yes, a water color shown on fig. 3, it is better to consider in the original, but also on the screen of the computer it looks завораживающе. And the film is better to look at a cinema, instead of on the screen of the TV set possessing more than modest resolution. But unless restricted possibilities of a TV screen can to prevent to empathize us to characters and to take pleasure in camerawork? Besides, no. Obviously, matter is not in details as those and not among them, and their art significance. And to be significant, the detail should be nevertheless not too small. Number of pixels essentially exactly so how much it helps to embody conceived by the author.
And here one more the example, concerning already esthetic properties of the facsimile. L. P.Dyko in «Conversations about photoskill» writes:
«Equally sharp image of all details which have come into the view of a lens becomes very frequent a serious lack of a picture. The frame starts to dazzle with set of the smallest particulars. The picture picture becomes tangled, overloaded. The eye of the spectator on what certain can’t stop because on a picture plane there is no figure or a subject, drawing to itself special attention, that is isn’t present an accent, the accent delivered on the main thing, on a central part of a plot. There is no main composite beginning – and the frame appears not generated, all its parts – equivalent. As a rule, absence of accent says and that the photographer not only hasn’t coped with the task of creation of certain geometry of a frame, but also has badly understood a material, in a being and sense of the plot selected for shooting, motive».
Partly thought true. But, at the same time, we already saw that images without «the main composite beginning» too can have esthetic value (fig. 2 see). Alas, very often, to make the simple formalized recommendation approaching for all occasions, it is impossible. Councils, recommendations, rules are important. No doubt. But in art they aren’t dogma. Concerns them as to the certain initial reference points facilitating somewhat achievement of delivered result more reasonably.

Specificity of a photographic composition demands the answer to a question more often: what details to leave in a frame? The answer is banal enough: what work on disclosure of an intention and an idea embodiment. Another matter that often the photographer isn’t free to control details in a frame. And this circumstance complicates operation of the pictorialist in comparison with the artist traditional. Often at frame configuration it is necessary to deal with mass of stochastic elements. And, owing to it, the question on a choice of an optimal composition is transformed to a question on control of randomnesses and on managing to force to work them on the decision of the main art task.

When the detail is a significant and intrinsic element of a composition, it is necessary to think how to place on it emphasis. To be noticeable, the detail should be selected with color, brightness, contrast, by the form, etc. In not studio photo of circumstance are often added so that unique possibility to underline this or that detail is connected to necessity to wait the necessary light. Thus in a role of a significant detail the shade from any object can appear, for example.

Besides other, the detail in a photo is capable to stimulate or destroy trust of the spectator to a picture. Even at the decision of art tasks the photo remains by itself, that is the tool of fixing of a reality. In this sense any unsuccessful detail is capable to destroy a formed artistic image. And, on the contrary, the authentic detail working on the main idea, is capable to distract the spectator from some technical and esthetic imperfections of a picture.

Happens that beginning photographers go into extremes of other sort. Photographing something, they not in forces to refuse those or other details. All particulars seem them rather important and significant. In a similar situation it is necessary to remind again only that composition art often is art of a failure from superfluous and cuts superfluous.

And, at last, the last. Quite often to remove ability implies ability to pay attention to details. At shooting it is quite good to reflect over alternative: can a significant detail it makes sense not to accent, and to make a principal element of a picture? Happens after all and so that the beauty separately the taken detail exceeds beauty of the whole.

IV. The Inference

Small article – too the restricted form for the high-grade story about significance of details in product of visual art. The author, being the realist, didn’t put before itself the problem to uncover the declared subject in all its completeness. The task stood other: to supply to the reader initial information, being repelled from which it can generate own judgement on a problem and the individual approach to its decision.

J.Lotman wrote: «… a significant element – always violation of some waiting …» [4]. Owing to it isn’t present and there can be no unitized uniform approach to display and treatment of details. Each artist should solve similar tasks.

And one more thought. Somehow time, appearing in one of telecasts, director Gennady Poloka has told about such phrase: «All artists possess sick vanity. But here when you forget about the vanity and all you plunge into someone’s creation – that, means, before you a true art». The Right thought! In the same way, if we face authoring creation and we reflect on a composition as a whole and about details in particular it means that operation hasn’t hooked on us, hasn’t touched our souls. If we face operation in the mute delight, shaken by its essence and the form, and even are ready to forgive to the author numerous separate flaws, that, it means, before us an original work of art. In end of this small overview article, the author would like to wish the reader as it is possible большего numbers of meetings with such products.

Photo plus the text

написано в рубрике: Software — Метки: — admin @ 12:02
Page 1 of 512345
It is quite often possible to hear judgement that the good photo speaks for itself and doesn’t need any explanations. So it so, yes not absolutely. As any other unduly categorical thought, this expression doesn’t take into consideration great variety of nuances.
I.
St.-Petersburg. A winter palace. Visitors slowly transit on gallery 1812 [1]. For the majority of them it is important to feel only the general atmosphere of a palace before an input in the Big throne-room. Sights smoothly slide on portraits of strangers. Whether probably under such circumstances to estimate art properties of one separate taken image? The answer depends on many additional factors. If, say, the guide for an instant draws attention of group to any portrait, some words about the represented person will tell, will tell about the author, etc. perception instantly changes. Сиюминутность both fugacity pale into insignificance, and of spectators details and prominent features of the specific image for some time take hold.
The portrait is a genre which often demands a context. Quite often to understand and estimate it to the full, it is necessary to know, who and under what circumstances is represented on it.
However, the accompanying text is important and for other genres. Words can’t make the image neither it is better, nor is worse. But they can affect perception essentially.
The bad guide can spoil impression of the most remarkable exposure while good — often clears up interest at the most indifferent audience. Why the Word plays so important role for us? Who knows … Perhaps, what it was in the beginning?
II.
About the family photochronicle often speak as about a genre interesting only for a narrow circle of persons, connected to the represented people family, friendly or other bonds.
For the author of these lines the family photo is something большее. After all as a matter of fact it differs from the picturesque portraits hanging in many museums and galleries a little. It, unconditionally, can be interesting and to wider audience. But under one condition: audience should interest not only the visual work of art, but also history, to which given product serves (can serve) as an illustration or addition.
On the properties, the family photo, is close, on the one hand,
To a graphic portrait, and, on the other hand, to newspaper репортажной illustrations, till the end of uncovered only in a combination to the explanatory text.
Art and technical imperfection of house photo albums in many cases are with interest compensated by documentation and possibility of a live tangency to a transient course of time.
The grandmother of the author of these lines (a photo 1), has led all war at the front, but never told about the front past. But she was always ready to tell set of other remarkable stories on the most different subjects. In them never was shreds назидательности. And its each story was full of live figurativeness and warm-heartedness. The love to art prose the author of these lines in many respects connects that in the early childhood he could listen to these surprising and fascinating stories.
Photo 1. My favourite grandmother,
60th years of the last century,
The author of a photo is unknown
Often, having heard similar explanations, the listener starts to peer more steadfastly into this not too original photooperation, trying to see in the opinion of the woman elderly and unfamiliar to it all those details which are informed it in the form of words.
Photo 2. The great-grandmother of the author in a surrounding of grandsons,
The Moscow studio, the middle of 30th years of the XX-th century
In many cases of the torn vast explanations it is not required. For awakening of spectator interest and offset of accents in perception enough only short explanations in the signature to a photo, and even simply only one signature. So the photo 2 can be interesting, for example, to that concerns to receive by then when people all family still went to studio of the photographer a photo in a family album.
III.
Very often eyewitnesses of any events, having seen somewhere «a documentary photo in art handling» can’t hide irritation. Sometimes their feelings will be transformed and to open perturbation. In similar cases many eyewitnesses put incomplete in many respects amateur pictures considerably above “artly-reportazhnyh” settings as the facts of life for them where as are more important than esthetic properties of a picture.
Many people appreciate a photo not as the tool for creation of artistic images, and as objective means of reflection and reality fixing. Such people feel at once any falseness, any lie and resolutely condemn. In all similar cases the explanatory text becomes nonseparable from the photo.
But not any text approaches for the description. The words accompanying the image, should be not less sincere and truthful, than visions with which they form a single whole.
One of visitors of a site in the letter to the author tells:
«My grandfather, Zhuravlyov Alexey Maksimovich, 1918 of the river, the main occupation — the bookkeeper, was engaged фотолюбительством since 1936 Its first camera,« the Tourist », has been acquired through the Mail order. The theory and photobusiness practice studied independently, in a settlement Pribalhashstroj barrack (nowadays Balkhash) in Kazakhstan. Printed from plates, illuminating their candle in a hen house (the electricity was only in a barrack). I apply the post-war pictures made the grandfather roughly in 1956-57 Normal photos on storage, made under normal conditions for Balkhash — the strong wind, a shining sun — transfer that invincible aspiration of the person to the best which has helped these people to be saved and live life, DESPITE. Here so. Thanks to interest of the grandfather to a photo now somehow it is possible to imagine that life which is embellished by nothing».
Photo 3. Balkhash. 1956-57 © A. M.Zhuravlyov
Photo 4. Balkhash. 1956-57 © A. M.Zhuravlyov
IV.
The text plays a crucial role not only in an amateur photo. Quite often it is important accent, and even a full element, in operation of the recognized master.
Photo 5. Death of the soldier-Loyalist. Spain. 1936 the Author: Robert Kapa
In the famous photo which was removed by R.Kapa, «Death of the soldier-Loyalist» (Robert Capa, Death of a Loyalist Soldier, Spain, 1936) many find this or that esthetics and beauty. For one is a beauty of a human feat, for others — beauty of a composition and the graphic decision. So, Chog-ho Ю writes [2]: “Photo” Death of the soldier-Loyalist »is one more good example of how the horror of death can be shown in the fine and arranged image. The displaced composition and falling turning point testify that the photo has been made осознанно, instead of on good luck».
The author can’t agree with similar words in any way. In its modest judgement to speak about an esthetics here it is not absolutely pertinent. The strongest influence of this image on the spectator is in many respects connected not so much to beauty, how many with the additional information containing in the signature: «Death of the soldier». Be it “Attack” or «On fronts of Spain» — there would be our perception invariable? Still we would rank this operation as world masterpieces? We as though perceived this photo if beforehand didn’t know, what only some instants prior to descent of a lock of the camera the represented person was full vital energy and had the diversified feeling and emotions, and after a second his soul has already abandoned this frail world?
Who knows … But nevertheless it is thought, what exactly fixing of the moment of loss of the person gives to this operation shrillness and lifts it to level of philosophical judgement.
The text can play an important role and when we deal not with so dramatic plots.
Photo 6. Anri Matisse’s portrait, 1944 the Author: A.Karte-Bresson
So, having seen for the first time the photo of Bressona presented on a photo 6, the author of these lines, is remembered, has thought: «Likely, it is any Asian grandfather from Bukhara or Samarkand. Behind a window of its dwelling for certain there is the small garden separated from dusty and stuffy street by a deaf high fence». When the author has read the signature under a photo, the Bukhara spirit has instantly disappeared without a trace, and Central Asia has immediately given way in perception of France.
* * *
Fine arts products in which perceptions the text plays an essential role, aren’t worse at all than self-sufficient art images. Like many other art forms, the photo can be independent and independent, and can be and a component of more difficult art decision. So, for example, in a motion-picture the photo appears in a surrounding of the text, music, the director’s decision, no less than still many other concomitant circumstances.
The photo is not obliged to be not so such someone what it wants (and-or can) to present. It only means, the tool … As to use it — everyone is free to solve.
LINKS
1. Military gallery of 1812 in the Winter palace. The virtual excursion.
2. Chog-ho Yu (Alex Yu). Aesthetics of Photography: Combining the Viewer’s and the Artist’s Standpoints (Printed in (2004) Art Criticism, 19 (1), 63-74)
APPLICATION-REFERENCE
Grandson A. M.Zhuravlyov has sent to the author the text recovered by the grandfather on storage of an old poem:
Mum Toshe has presented
The camera.
The device such good —
Will remove all successively.
— Well, It is lovely, rise прямее,
Smile more cheerfully,
In the device here look,
I remove — time, two, three!
Ah-jaj-jaj, tell on favor,
What is it has turned out:
It is lovely with a bow, песьи ears …
— I didn’t change a plate,
All one plate has removed!
The request to respond all to whom the author of this children’s rhyme and-or the full original text is known. Thanks.

It is quite often possible to hear judgement that the good photo speaks for itself and doesn’t need any explanations. So it so, yes not absolutely. As any other unduly categorical thought, this expression doesn’t take into consideration great variety of nuances.
I.
St.-Petersburg. A winter palace. Visitors slowly transit on gallery 1812 [1]. For the majority of them it is important to feel only the general atmosphere of a palace before an input in the Big throne-room. Sights smoothly slide on portraits of strangers. Whether probably under such circumstances to estimate art properties of one separate taken image? The answer depends on many additional factors. If, say, the guide for an instant draws attention of group to any portrait, some words about the represented person will tell, will tell about the author, etc. perception instantly changes. Сиюминутность both fugacity pale into insignificance, and of spectators details and prominent features of the specific image for some time take hold.
The portrait is a genre which often demands a context. Quite often to understand and estimate it to the full, it is necessary to know, who and under what circumstances is represented on it.
However, the accompanying text is important and for other genres. Words can’t make the image neither it is better, nor is worse. But they can affect perception essentially.
The bad guide can spoil impression of the most remarkable exposure while good — often clears up interest at the most indifferent audience. Why the Word plays so important role for us? Who knows … Perhaps, what it was in the beginning?
II.
About the family photochronicle often speak as about a genre interesting only for a narrow circle of persons, connected to the represented people family, friendly or other bonds.
For the author of these lines the family photo is something большее. After all as a matter of fact it differs from the picturesque portraits hanging in many museums and galleries a little. It, unconditionally, can be interesting and to wider audience. But under one condition: audience should interest not only the visual work of art, but also history, to which given product serves (can serve) as an illustration or addition.

On the properties, the family photo, is close, on the one hand,To a graphic portrait, and, on the other hand, to newspaper репортажной illustrations, till the end of uncovered only in a combination to the explanatory text.
Art and technical imperfection of house photo albums in many cases are with interest compensated by documentation and possibility of a live tangency to a transient course of time.
The grandmother of the author of these lines (a photo 1), has led all war at the front, but never told about the front past. But she was always ready to tell set of other remarkable stories on the most different subjects. In them never was shreds назидательности. And its each story was full of live figurativeness and warm-heartedness. The love to art prose the author of these lines in many respects connects that in the early childhood he could listen to these surprising and fascinating stories.
Photo 1. My favourite grandmother,60th years of the last century,The author of a photo is unknown    Often, having heard similar explanations, the listener starts to peer more steadfastly into this not too original photooperation, trying to see in the opinion of the woman elderly and unfamiliar to it all those details which are informed it in the form of words.

Photo 2. The great-grandmother of the author in a surrounding of grandsons,The Moscow studio, the middle of 30th years of the XX-th century
In many cases of the torn vast explanations it is not required. For awakening of spectator interest and offset of accents in perception enough only short explanations in the signature to a photo, and even simply only one signature. So the photo 2 can be interesting, for example, to that concerns to receive by then when people all family still went to studio of the photographer a photo in a family album.

III.
Very often eyewitnesses of any events, having seen somewhere «a documentary photo in art handling» can’t hide irritation. Sometimes their feelings will be transformed and to open perturbation. In similar cases many eyewitnesses put incomplete in many respects amateur pictures considerably above “artly-reportazhnyh” settings as the facts of life for them where as are more important than esthetic properties of a picture.
Many people appreciate a photo not as the tool for creation of artistic images, and as objective means of reflection and reality fixing. Such people feel at once any falseness, any lie and resolutely condemn. In all similar cases the explanatory text becomes nonseparable from the photo.
But not any text approaches for the description. The words accompanying the image, should be not less sincere and truthful, than visions with which they form a single whole.
One of visitors of a site in the letter to the author tells:
«My grandfather, Zhuravlyov Alexey Maksimovich, 1918 of the river, the main occupation — the bookkeeper, was engaged фотолюбительством since 1936 Its first camera,« the Tourist », has been acquired through the Mail order. The theory and photobusiness practice studied independently, in a settlement Pribalhashstroj barrack (nowadays Balkhash) in Kazakhstan. Printed from plates, illuminating their candle in a hen house (the electricity was only in a barrack). I apply the post-war pictures made the grandfather roughly in 1956-57 Normal photos on storage, made under normal conditions for Balkhash — the strong wind, a shining sun — transfer that invincible aspiration of the person to the best which has helped these people to be saved and live life, DESPITE. Here so. Thanks to interest of the grandfather to a photo now somehow it is possible to imagine that life which is embellished by nothing».

Photo 3. Balkhash. 1956-57 © A. M.Zhuravlyov

Photo 4. Balkhash. 1956-57 © A. M.Zhuravlyov
IV.
The text plays a crucial role not only in an amateur photo. Quite often it is important accent, and even a full element, in operation of the recognized master.

Photo 5. Death of the soldier-Loyalist. Spain. 1936 the Author: Robert Kapa
In the famous photo which was removed by R.Kapa, «Death of the soldier-Loyalist» (Robert Capa, Death of a Loyalist Soldier, Spain, 1936) many find this or that esthetics and beauty. For one is a beauty of a human feat, for others — beauty of a composition and the graphic decision. So, Chog-ho Ю writes [2]: “Photo” Death of the soldier-Loyalist »is one more good example of how the horror of death can be shown in the fine and arranged image. The displaced composition and falling turning point testify that the photo has been made осознанно, instead of on good luck».
The author can’t agree with similar words in any way. In its modest judgement to speak about an esthetics here it is not absolutely pertinent. The strongest influence of this image on the spectator is in many respects connected not so much to beauty, how many with the additional information containing in the signature: «Death of the soldier». Be it “Attack” or «On fronts of Spain» — there would be our perception invariable? Still we would rank this operation as world masterpieces? We as though perceived this photo if beforehand didn’t know, what only some instants prior to descent of a lock of the camera the represented person was full vital energy and had the diversified feeling and emotions, and after a second his soul has already abandoned this frail world?
Who knows … But nevertheless it is thought, what exactly fixing of the moment of loss of the person gives to this operation shrillness and lifts it to level of philosophical judgement.
The text can play an important role and when we deal not with so dramatic plots.

Photo 6. Anri Matisse’s portrait, 1944 the Author: A.Karte-Bresson

So, having seen for the first time the photo of Bressona presented on a photo 6, the author of these lines, is remembered, has thought: «Likely, it is any Asian grandfather from Bukhara or Samarkand. Behind a window of its dwelling for certain there is the small garden separated from dusty and stuffy street by a deaf high fence». When the author has read the signature under a photo, the Bukhara spirit has instantly disappeared without a trace, and Central Asia has immediately given way in perception of France.
* * *
Fine arts products in which perceptions the text plays an essential role, aren’t worse at all than self-sufficient art images. Like many other art forms, the photo can be independent and independent, and can be and a component of more difficult art decision. So, for example, in a motion-picture the photo appears in a surrounding of the text, music, the director’s decision, no less than still many other concomitant circumstances.
The photo is not obliged to be not so such someone what it wants (and-or can) to present. It only means, the tool … As to use it — everyone is free to solve.
LINKS
1. Military gallery of 1812 in the Winter palace. The virtual excursion.
2. Chog-ho Yu (Alex Yu). Aesthetics of Photography: Combining the Viewer’s and the Artist’s Standpoints (Printed in (2004) Art Criticism, 19 (1), 63-74)
APPLICATION-REFERENCE
Grandson A. M.Zhuravlyov has sent to the author the text recovered by the grandfather on storage of an old poem:
Mum Toshe has presentedThe camera.The device such good —Will remove all successively.— Well, It is lovely, rise прямее,Smile more cheerfully,In the device here look,I remove — time, two, three!Ah-jaj-jaj, tell on favor,What is it has turned out:It is lovely with a bow, песьи ears … — I didn’t change a plate,All one plate has removed!
The request to respond all to whom the author of this children’s rhyme and-or the full original text is known. Thanks.

Tree, you mine of a tree …

написано в рубрике: Review, Software — Метки: , — admin @ 11:58
Page 1 of 512345
I.
For some reason many photographers – fans are inclined to consider(examine) a photo extremely as a kind of fine arts. On the  business at not ё great variety of various applicabilities. And any of them can not be named main or, on the contrary, minor.
In middle позапрошлого of century to the supporters of a photo many efforts were necessary to apply to prove an accessory(belonging) of a photo to graceful arts (see, for example, chapter 5 in [4]). Nowadays there is an opposite situation. The photographers – fans should constantly remind, that the photo can be and source of occurrence of the new documents, both tool of knowledge, and way of creation of illustrations, and object of attention of the collectors, and basis for creation of the family chronicle, both technical tool, and fascinating leisure, and area of realization of the design decisions, and also to carry out great variety of other tasks and to serve to the diversified purposes. Even the exhibition photo not always should be art. In a historical exposition the photodocuments and photocertificates are quite admitted(quite allowed,quite allowable), and in a polytechnical museum the photos of technical achievement of the past are absolutely pertinent.
Banal ideas? Can be and so … But, to a great regret, there were they not on an empty place. Alas, снобизм of some photographers – fans surprising scale gets at times.
« No – no, I do not take off banal kinds and cards! » — declares one of them. Thus he, naturally, means, that all it(him) устремления are directed on creation of original works of art. Precisely with the same ideas in a head another speaks: « me the technical subtleties of photoshooting do not interest; my task — to pass emotions and feelings, and in engineering the engineers, physics and chemists let are interested! » Thus it is meant, that all of engineering and the engineers work only for creation of the tool, with which help the author – photographer can realize the highly artistic plans.
That! To understand such people it is possible. Similar снобизм проистекает from human эгоцентризма. Differently, everyone considers(counts), that his(its) approaches and vital principles are correct, and other people in this or that measure are mistaken.
But not for dispute this clause serves. Е ё the purpose is much more modest. The author of these lines simply would like ещ ё of time to remind to dear readers, that the occasions for снобизма are far-fetched more often. Everyone is free to see in a photo something сво ё.
II.
To not be голословным and excessively instructive, I shall try to illustrate the stated ideas with a small photo-sketch.
When about three years back reflected and the site «Hobbymaker’s’ was created, I precipitately have expressed on one of pages in the sense that through ten years any photo of a urban landscape gets the special, historical value. About, as наивен I was! Nowadays there is no necessity to wait so long. The changes in city occur much more quickly.
After almost three years many urban landscapes published on this site to not learn(find out)!, for example, this urban kind rather strongly has changed. A temple « Large Вознесение » обзавёлся own колокольней. And to find out, whether looks out still because of a wall a shy tree, now it is impossible, as the point, from which the picture was made, is built up by garages, and to pass to her in any way it is impossible. In a photo of November demonstration the slice of hotel “«Moscow”, nowadays сровненной with землёю is seen. And Moscow дворик, shown on other photo, up to unrecognizability has changed. Inside him(it) the building has grown solid on the sizes. And it вс ё only examples concerning photos of this site! And how much other changes can be noticed on the various photoimages stored(kept) in personal photoarchive of the author of these lines!
However most surprising, on my sight, transformation has taken place with the urban kind which has been removed(taken off) by me in a garden “«Эрмитаж”. But about it it would be desirable to talk more in detail …
III.
About three and a half of one year back it was possible to me to remove(take off) a photo « Two лавочки, two trees, lantern and bottle » (see fig. 1). At shooting any especial art supertask передо by me did not stand. Simply I would like to fix on a film an input(entrance) in the updated garden “«Эрмитаж”. No more. But also not less.
And after only I years a little again has embodied the same kind (fig. 2).
Fig. 1. Two лавочки, two trees, lantern and bottle. Фоторабота from archive of the author.
( Moscow, August, 2001)
Fig. 2. After three and a half of one year
( Moscow, April, 2005)
Any is not required special наблюдательности to notice surprising метаморфозы.
The first and main change: alas, two trees without leaving a trace have disappeared. Whether they have choked in exhaust gases, similarly to many trees on a Garden ring New Арбате or on Tver? Whether have cut them on strategic reasons? (From them the perfect kind on Moscow “«скотленд-ярд” opened. Whether) Пали they by a victim of unknown invasion of the insects – wreckers? The answer is not known for me. Anyway: it is very a pity … very much …
In another way look and лавочки. Initial ажурные of a product of садово-park applied art made and – ля модерн, have conceded a place to more prosy and more practical decisions.
About the missed bottle and to speak it is not necessary. But whether costs(stands) under such circumstances горевать about her? The question, as is spoken, rhetorical. However, it is impossible to exclude probability of presence of some of bottles in new garden garbage urns (at all absent on the first photo). How to know?! That bottle натолкнула of the workers of park on an idea on necessity can to place in a garden enough of containers for dust?:-)
The observant spectator can notice ещ ё one distinction: at edge(territory) of a round bed a lantern nowadays has appeared. What for he? Whence has undertaken? Where he shines? On what he is called to spill electrical light?
In searches of the answer on these questions I have approached to a lantern more close.
Fig. 3. First Moscow
Electrical lantern
Fig. 4. Really that?!
The presentiments have not deceived. The lantern has appeared here неспроста. As appeared from small таблички, передо I was the first Moscow electrical lantern after restoration (fig. 3 and 4).
He whence has undertaken? Where was stored(kept) (or simply валялся) more than 120 years? In what the restoration consist? Again continuous questions … for some reason seem to me, what a lantern — a product of modern manufacture executed on the old drawings (to engravings? To photos?) However, I shall not be занудствовать. Let’s consider(count), what is it that first electrical street fixture! As for the first time electrical street illumination really has appeared in Moscow here, in a garden “«Эрмитаж” [2].
Достоин of a mention also following fact: on explanatory табличке is fixed (is immortalized?) surname of the present First Vice-mayor of Moscow. Not of the founder of the first electrical lantern! Not of the author of the art project! Not of the engineer developed and who has embodied in metal this product, necessary to city! THE NOT manager(doing not manage) of a Garden in those far times! Namely present Vice-mayor! No, I not against … Quite admit, that the Vice-mayor — the man worthy. But вс ё something strange sees to me in all this business. And place for a lantern is chosen not absolutely successfully … However, it, probably, begin стариковские ворчалки. It is time, видать, clause to finish. I stop …:-)
In the conclusion only I shall notice: truly, the photos with лёгкостью can turn to the skilful story-tellers capable поведать to the grateful students the surprising histories.
INSTEAD OF an EPILOGUE
If the colleague on general(common) hobby for a photo will approach to you and will begin to convince you, that the photo by all means should be art — not enter with it(him) disputes. Everyone is free to find and to see in her that considers(counts) for itself necessary. As almost any other human activity, the photo can be lead up to a level of art. But also, not having reached(achieved) this level, she will be for us useful and interesting.

I.
For some reason many photographers – fans are inclined to consider(examine) a photo extremely as a kind of fine arts. On the  business at not ё great variety of various applicabilities. And any of them can not be named main or, on the contrary, minor.
In middle позапрошлого of century to the supporters of a photo many efforts were necessary to apply to prove an accessory(belonging) of a photo to graceful arts (see, for example, chapter 5 in [4]). Nowadays there is an opposite situation. The photographers – fans should constantly remind, that the photo can be and source of occurrence of the new documents, both tool of knowledge, and way of creation of illustrations, and object of attention of the collectors, and basis for creation of the family chronicle, both technical tool, and fascinating leisure, and area of realization of the design decisions, and also to carry out great variety of other tasks and to serve to the diversified purposes. Even the exhibition photo not always should be art. In a historical exposition the photodocuments and photocertificates are quite admitted(quite allowed,quite allowable), and in a polytechnical museum the photos of technical achievement of the past are absolutely pertinent.
Banal ideas? Can be and so … But, to a great regret, there were they not on an empty place. Alas, снобизм of some photographers – fans surprising scale gets at times.
« No – no, I do not take off banal kinds and cards! » — declares one of them. Thus he, naturally, means, that all it(him) устремления are directed on creation of original works of art. Precisely with the same ideas in a head another speaks: « me the technical subtleties of photoshooting do not interest; my task — to pass emotions and feelings, and in engineering the engineers, physics and chemists let are interested! » Thus it is meant, that all of engineering and the engineers work only for creation of the tool, with which help the author – photographer can realize the highly artistic plans.
That! To understand such people it is possible. Similar снобизм проистекает from human эгоцентризма. Differently, everyone considers(counts), that his(its) approaches and vital principles are correct, and other people in this or that measure are mistaken.
But not for dispute this clause serves. Е ё the purpose is much more modest. The author of these lines simply would like ещ ё of time to remind to dear readers, that the occasions for снобизма are far-fetched more often. Everyone is free to see in a photo something сво ё.

II.
To not be голословным and excessively instructive, I shall try to illustrate the stated ideas with a small photo-sketch.
When about three years back reflected and the site «Hobbymaker’s’ was created, I precipitately have expressed on one of pages in the sense that through ten years any photo of a urban landscape gets the special, historical value. About, as наивен I was! Nowadays there is no necessity to wait so long. The changes in city occur much more quickly.
After almost three years many urban landscapes published on this site to not learn(find out)!, for example, this urban kind rather strongly has changed. A temple « Large Вознесение » обзавёлся own колокольней. And to find out, whether looks out still because of a wall a shy tree, now it is impossible, as the point, from which the picture was made, is built up by garages, and to pass to her in any way it is impossible. In a photo of November demonstration the slice of hotel “«Moscow”, nowadays сровненной with землёю is seen. And Moscow дворик, shown on other photo, up to unrecognizability has changed. Inside him(it) the building has grown solid on the sizes. And it вс ё only examples concerning photos of this site! And how much other changes can be noticed on the various photoimages stored(kept) in personal photoarchive of the author of these lines!
However most surprising, on my sight, transformation has taken place with the urban kind which has been removed(taken off) by me in a garden “«Эрмитаж”. But about it it would be desirable to talk more in detail …
III.
About three and a half of one year back it was possible to me to remove(take off) a photo « Two лавочки, two trees, lantern and bottle » (see fig. 1). At shooting any especial art supertask передо by me did not stand. Simply I would like to fix on a film an input(entrance) in the updated garden “«Эрмитаж”. No more. But also not less.
And after only I years a little again has embodied the same kind (fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Two лавочки, two trees, lantern and bottle. Фоторабота from archive of the author.( Moscow, August, 2001)Fig. 2. After three and a half of one year( Moscow, April, 2005)
Any is not required special наблюдательности to notice surprising метаморфозы.
The first and main change: alas, two trees without leaving a trace have disappeared. Whether they have choked in exhaust gases, similarly to many trees on a Garden ring New Арбате or on Tver? Whether have cut them on strategic reasons? (From them the perfect kind on Moscow “«скотленд-ярд” opened. Whether) Пали they by a victim of unknown invasion of the insects – wreckers? The answer is not known for me. Anyway: it is very a pity … very much …
In another way look and лавочки. Initial ажурные of a product of садово-park applied art made and – ля модерн, have conceded a place to more prosy and more practical decisions.
About the missed bottle and to speak it is not necessary. But whether costs(stands) under such circumstances горевать about her? The question, as is spoken, rhetorical. However, it is impossible to exclude probability of presence of some of bottles in new garden garbage urns (at all absent on the first photo). How to know?! That bottle натолкнула of the workers of park on an idea on necessity can to place in a garden enough of containers for dust?:-)
The observant spectator can notice ещ ё one distinction: at edge(territory) of a round bed a lantern nowadays has appeared. What for he? Whence has undertaken? Where he shines? On what he is called to spill electrical light?
In searches of the answer on these questions I have approached to a lantern more close.

Fig. 3. First MoscowElectrical lanternFig. 4. Really that?!       The presentiments have not deceived. The lantern has appeared here неспроста. As appeared from small таблички, передо I was the first Moscow electrical lantern after restoration (fig. 3 and 4).
He whence has undertaken? Where was stored(kept) (or simply валялся) more than 120 years? In what the restoration consist? Again continuous questions … for some reason seem to me, what a lantern — a product of modern manufacture executed on the old drawings (to engravings? To photos?) However, I shall not be занудствовать. Let’s consider(count), what is it that first electrical street fixture! As for the first time electrical street illumination really has appeared in Moscow here, in a garden “«Эрмитаж” [2].
Достоин of a mention also following fact: on explanatory табличке is fixed (is immortalized?) surname of the present First Vice-mayor of Moscow. Not of the founder of the first electrical lantern! Not of the author of the art project! Not of the engineer developed and who has embodied in metal this product, necessary to city! THE NOT manager(doing not manage) of a Garden in those far times! Namely present Vice-mayor! No, I not against … Quite admit, that the Vice-mayor — the man worthy. But вс ё something strange sees to me in all this business. And place for a lantern is chosen not absolutely successfully … However, it, probably, begin стариковские ворчалки. It is time, видать, clause to finish. I stop …:-)
In the conclusion only I shall notice: truly, the photos with лёгкостью can turn to the skilful story-tellers capable поведать to the grateful students the surprising histories.

INSTEAD OF an EPILOGUE
If the colleague on general(common) hobby for a photo will approach to you and will begin to convince you, that the photo by all means should be art — not enter with it(him) disputes. Everyone is free to find and to see in her that considers(counts) for itself necessary. As almost any other human activity, the photo can be lead up to a level of art. But also, not having reached(achieved) this level, she will be for us useful and interesting.

Noise and grain

написано в рубрике: News, Software, Tips — Метки: , , — admin @ 11:35
Page 1 of 512345
I. Introduction
In age-old times the granularity of the image, characteristic for a film photo, was possible poorly сымитировать in Photoshop with the help of the filter Add Noise. In later versions of this program the special filter Film Grain has appeared. But whether the new opportunities have appeared together with this filter? Whether really this filter can create similarity of a film grain? As far as the result will be better in comparison with old – kind Add Noise? In searches of the answers on these questions the author also has decided(solved) to lead(carry out) a little new « of small unscientific experiments ».
II. Аллегро
But what for to add to the image a grain and – or noise?
Reasonable question! You see quite often it is necessary to collide with an opposite task: how to make noise by less appreciable?
The reasons, after which the image after addition of noise is improved, can be a little:
1.
The visual perception(recognition) of the man is arranged in such a manner that extended равноокрашенные of area eyes + brain » as unnatural, plastic, мультяшные often are perceived by system «. For this reason the image formed by digital chambers, often looks a little unnaturally, while the prints from a film are looked by more attractive for eyes.
In a traditional photo missing to an eye текстуры rather successfully simulates a grain of a film. The digital noise creates at the spectator completely other sensations. His(its) presence creates on the image inappropriate multi-coloured points, which зрительно not possible in any way ассоциировать with any natural текстурой.
However addition nobody of special noise to digital картинке in a number(line) of cases allows quite successfully to decide(solve) a task of creation of illusion that lost текстуры are restored.
2.
Ещ ё one reason, on which to the image add noise, is the desire to compensate distortions caused by digital processing. For example, noise it is possible to disguise areas of inaccurate digital editing or «to “restore” текстуры after application of the filter Blur.
3.
Sometimes it happens it is useful to add in картинку noise directly ahead of a seal. Business that the printers often растрируют the image by that or otherwise (that is, break it(him) in a new fashion into lines and elements), that can result in appreciable distortions of tones, of gradients etc. Addition of noise in some cases helps to overcome errors растрирования at a seal (that is, to make them by less appreciable).
4.
The addition of noise in some cases can also increase зрительно perceived sharpness (see fig. 1 and 2).
Fig. 1. A fragment of the rather dim image
Fig. 2. The same fragment, but with the added noise. Sharpnesses, certainly, has not increased. But зрительно many sites are looked as more precise.
For certain there are also other bases for addition of noise in the digital image … Within the framework of a heading of the unscientific tests the author does not apply for completeness of a statement … However it is time already without superfluous meditations and теоретизирований to proceed(pass) to practical testing!
III. Анданте
In a fig. 3 the photo made by a digital soap tray is given. As it is visible, the absence of a film grain really does(makes) the image little bit “«plastic”.
Fig. 3. Яузские a gate.
Whether always it is bad? It is difficult to say … to Such images the aesthetics is peculiar. Sometimes they are very expressive. But in own way! At all how prints received by an optical image from a film or a plate.
To refuse such images in художественности — вс ё is equal, that scornfully concerns to анимационной the diagram! And you see many рисованные the animated staff являют by itself an example of the present art!
However, the author does not aspire to convince the reader in чём-or. It is more than opinions, good and different!
IV. Скерцо
In a fig. 4 and fig. 5 same staff is submitted after two variants of computer processing.
Fig. 4. Result after addition of noise with the help of the filter Add Noise
Fig. 5. Result after addition of a grain with the help of the filter Film Grain
In the beginning (fig. 4) the attempt сымитировать a grain by a traditional image with the help of the filter Add Noise was undertaken. For imitation of a grain the noise should be Gaussian and Monochromatic. The first condition as a matter of fact means, that than deviations(rejection) from face value — by that they more are less probable. The second condition means, that the noise will not result in sharp deviations(rejections) of colour in separate пикселях. Formally, both these conditions should ensure(supply) the closest imitation a film grain. However it is not necessary to accept вс ё on веру: in various practical situations it is possible to try to experiment and with other parameters of this filter. To indisputable advantages of function Add Noise it is necessary also to attribute(relate) an opportunity to vary parameter Amount to within the 100-th shares of percent(interest).
In a fig. 5 the result of application of the filter Film Grain (group Artistic) is shown. The auxiliary parameters Intensity and Highlight Area were established in a zero.
In both cases was chosen rather strong (but ещ ё acceptable) degree “«шумизации”: Amount = 2 and Grain = 2. The so large level of the added noise was called to simplify procedure of comparison and analysis of results. Also it is necessary to mean, that parameter Grain of the filter Film Grain can accept, alas, only integer meanings(importance).
At comparison of results it is not necessary « to drive by a nose on the screen of the monitor »: it is more reasonable to look on картинки from distance of the extended hand.
V. Ending
As it is easy to guess, within the framework of unscientific experiments of any categorical and certain conclusions will not follow. But some words on the rights of private(individual) opinion the author вс ё should say.
The experiment has shown, what even the special filter Film Grain simulates the present grain of a film far неидеально. And if to take into account, that parameter Amount can be exposed more precisely in the filter Add Noise, the appeal of the tool Film Grain becomes ещ ё less.
At the same time it is necessary to remember, that the author at all does not consider(count) itself as the professional in computer processing. Probably in more skilful hands the considered filters повели itself in another way.
Experiment independently! In this appeal — sense of all clauses published in a cycle « the small unscientific tests ».

I. Introduction
In age-old times the granularity of the image, characteristic for a film photo, was possible poorly сымитировать in Photoshop with the help of the filter Add Noise. In later versions of this program the special filter Film Grain has appeared. But whether the new opportunities have appeared together with this filter? Whether really this filter can create similarity of a film grain? As far as the result will be better in comparison with old – kind Add Noise? In searches of the answers on these questions the author also has decided(solved) to lead(carry out) a little new « of small unscientific experiments ».

II. Allego

But what for to add to the image a grain and – or noise?
Reasonable question! You see quite often it is necessary to collide with an opposite task: how to make noise by less appreciable?
The reasons, after which the image after addition of noise is improved, can be a little:
1.The visual perception(recognition) of the man is arranged in such a manner that extended равноокрашенные of area eyes + brain » as unnatural, plastic, мультяшные often are perceived by system «. For this reason the image formed by digital chambers, often looks a little unnaturally, while the prints from a film are looked by more attractive for eyes.
In a traditional photo missing to an eye текстуры rather successfully simulates a grain of a film. The digital noise creates at the spectator completely other sensations. His(its) presence creates on the image inappropriate multi-coloured points, which зрительно not possible in any way ассоциировать with any natural текстурой.
However addition nobody of special noise to digital картинке in a number(line) of cases allows quite successfully to decide(solve) a task of creation of illusion that lost текстуры are restored.
2.Ещ ё one reason, on which to the image add noise, is the desire to compensate distortions caused by digital processing. For example, noise it is possible to disguise areas of inaccurate digital editing or «to “restore” текстуры after application of the filter Blur.
3.Sometimes it happens it is useful to add in картинку noise directly ahead of a seal. Business that the printers often растрируют the image by that or otherwise (that is, break it(him) in a new fashion into lines and elements), that can result in appreciable distortions of tones, of gradients etc. Addition of noise in some cases helps to overcome errors растрирования at a seal (that is, to make them by less appreciable).
4.The addition of noise in some cases can also increase зрительно perceived sharpness (see fig. 1 and 2).
Fig. 1. A fragment of the rather dim image  Fig. 2. The same fragment, but with the added noise. Sharpnesses, certainly, has not increased. But зрительно many sites are looked as more precise.   For certain there are also other bases for addition of noise in the digital image … Within the framework of a heading of the unscientific tests the author does not apply for completeness of a statement … However it is time already without superfluous meditations and теоретизирований to proceed(pass) to practical testing!

III. Анданте
In a fig. 3 the photo made by a digital soap tray is given. As it is visible, the absence of a film grain really does(makes) the image little bit “«plastic”.

Fig. 3. Яузские a gate.
Whether always it is bad? It is difficult to say … to Such images the aesthetics is peculiar. Sometimes they are very expressive. But in own way! At all how prints received by an optical image from a film or a plate.
To refuse such images in художественности — вс ё is equal, that scornfully concerns to анимационной the diagram! And you see many рисованные the animated staff являют by itself an example of the present art!
However, the author does not aspire to convince the reader in чём-or. It is more than opinions, good and different!

IV. Скерцо
In a fig. 4 and fig. 5 same staff is submitted after two variants of computer processing.
Fig. 4. Result after addition of noise with the help of the filter Add Noise  Fig. 5. Result after addition of a grain with the help of the filter Film Grain   In the beginning (fig. 4) the attempt сымитировать a grain by a traditional image with the help of the filter Add Noise was undertaken. For imitation of a grain the noise should be Gaussian and Monochromatic. The first condition as a matter of fact means, that than deviations(rejection) from face value — by that they more are less probable. The second condition means, that the noise will not result in sharp deviations(rejections) of colour in separate пикселях. Formally, both these conditions should ensure(supply) the closest imitation a film grain. However it is not necessary to accept вс ё on веру: in various practical situations it is possible to try to experiment and with other parameters of this filter. To indisputable advantages of function Add Noise it is necessary also to attribute(relate) an opportunity to vary parameter Amount to within the 100-th shares of percent(interest).
In a fig. 5 the result of application of the filter Film Grain (group Artistic) is shown. The auxiliary parameters Intensity and Highlight Area were established in a zero.
In both cases was chosen rather strong (but ещ ё acceptable) degree “«шумизации”: Amount = 2 and Grain = 2. The so large level of the added noise was called to simplify procedure of comparison and analysis of results. Also it is necessary to mean, that parameter Grain of the filter Film Grain can accept, alas, only integer meanings(importance).
At comparison of results it is not necessary « to drive by a nose on the screen of the monitor »: it is more reasonable to look on картинки from distance of the extended hand.

V. Ending
As it is easy to guess, within the framework of unscientific experiments of any categorical and certain conclusions will not follow. But some words on the rights of private(individual) opinion the author вс ё should say.
The experiment has shown, what even the special filter Film Grain simulates the present grain of a film far неидеально. And if to take into account, that parameter Amount can be exposed more precisely in the filter Add Noise, the appeal of the tool Film Grain becomes ещ ё less.
At the same time it is necessary to remember, that the author at all does not consider(count) itself as the professional in computer processing. Probably in more skilful hands the considered filters повели itself in another way.
Experiment independently! In this appeal — sense of all clauses published in a cycle « the small unscientific tests ».

Работает на WordPress